Fixed-Point Elimination in the Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus
نویسندگان
چکیده
It is a consequence of existing literature that least and greatest fixed-points of monotone polynomials on Heyting algebras—that is, the algebraic models of the Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus—always exist, even when these algebras are not complete as lattices. The reason is that these extremal fixed-points are definable by formulas of the IPC. Consequently, the μ-calculus based on intuitionistic logic is trivial, every μ-formula being equivalent to a fixed-point free formula. We give in this paper an axiomatization of least and greatest fixed-points of formulas, and an algorithm to compute a fixed-point free formula equivalent to a given μ-formula. The axiomatization of the greatest fixed-point is simple. The axiomatization of the least fixedpoint is more complex, in particular every monotone formula converges to its least fixed-point by Kleene’s iteration in a finite number of steps, but there is no uniform upper bound on the number of iterations. We extract, out of the algorithm, upper bounds for such n, depending on the size of the formula. For some formulas, we show that these upper bounds are polynomial and optimal.
منابع مشابه
Fixed-point elimination in the Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus (extended version)
It is a consequence of existing literature that least and greatest fixed-points of monotone polynomials on Heyting algebras-that is, the alge- braic models of the Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus-always exist, even when these algebras are not complete as lattices. The reason is that these extremal fixed-points are definable by formulas of the IPC. Consequently, the $\mu$-calculus based on ...
متن کاملProof Search and Countermodel Construction in Bi-intuitionistic Propositional Logic
Bi-intuitionistic propositional logic (also known as Heyting-Brouwer logic, subtractive logic) extends intuitionistic propositional logic with a connective that is dual to implication, called coimplication. It is the logic of bi-[Cartesian closed] categories and it also has a Kripke semantics. It first got the attention of C. Rauszer who studied it in a number of papers. Later, it has been inve...
متن کاملExtended Abstract: Reconsidering Intuitionistic Duality
This paper proposes a new syntax and proof system called Dualized Intuitionistic Logic (DIL), for intuitionistic propositional logic with the subtraction operator. Our goal is a conservative extension of standard propositional intuitionistic logic with perfect duality (symmetry) between positive and negative connectives. The proof system should satisfy the following metatheoretic properties: so...
متن کاملCut Elimination for a Class of Propositional Based Logics
Sufficient conditions for propositional based logics to enjoy cut elimination are established. These conditions are satisfied by a wide class of logics encompassing among others classical and intuitionistic logic, modal logic S4, and classical and intuitionistic linear logic and some of their fragments. The class of logics is characterized by the type of rules and provisos used in their sequent...
متن کاملSequent Calculus for Intuitionistic Logic
We present a system of sequent calculus for intuitionistic propositional logic. In later chapters we obtain stronger systems by adding rules to this basic system, and we therefore go through its proof-theoretical properties in detail, in particular the admissibility of structural rules and the basic consequences of cut elimination. Many of these properties can then be verified in a routine fash...
متن کامل